NewHomes guide Sees a Pop in Readership


Dirt on the Market (February 2012)

To read the entire newsletter, click here:  DOTM 2012 02 09


Sister*Stats (January 2012)

For a summary of the real estate market in the metro DC area during 2011, click here:  SS 2012 01.  Here’s the first page:

 

 


Dirt on the Market (January 2012)

 

For the January 2012 edition of “Dirt on the Market”, click:  DOTM 2012 01 10

Here’s an excerpt:


Jobs and Job Growth Rate

The red area on the graph below illustrates job growth in Loudoun County from January 2007 to July 2011 (as measured on the left axis).  Over the period, 16,682 new jobs were added to the local economy for an average of 303 per month.  While that is impressive in a down economy, the growth rate did slow dramatically.  The blue line indicates month-over-year percentage growth since January 2007.  For the first half of 2007, annual job growth hovered around 5 percent.  For the next year, annual growth ranged from 3.9 to 4.9 percent.  In the last quarter of 2008, growth steadily declined to about 3.2 percent.

Then the bottom fell out.

In January 2009, annual job growth plummetted to .7 percent.  It was not until August of 2010 that annual job growth in Loudoun exceeded 1 percent.  With a couple of exceptions, the growth rate has ranged from 1 to 2 percent since.  The straight blue line indicates the long-term trend in job growth.

Given the downward trend, what is the good news?

Annual growth stayed positive over the entire period under very trying circumstances.

The same cannot be said for neighboring Fairfax County.  As shown below, annual job growth was actually negative from November 2008 to December 2009 in Fairfax.  The downturn started earlier in Prince William County.  Like Loudoun, annual job growth there never fell below 0 percent but it hovered at less than 1 percent from November 2008 to December 2010.

It is interesting to note, in closing, the differences in growth between Loudoun and its neighbors.  Loudoun’s job base was growing much faster than both Fairfax and Prince William counties from 2007 through 2008.  It’s decline in January 2009 was much steeper than in Fairfax while Prince William was actually adding jobs.  Since January 2010, the growth rate in all three counties has been exactly the same, every single month, even though the number of jobs is vastly different between the three.


Subdivision Analysis: Villages of Purcellville 2011 09 15

Prices on the Rise

Last month there were no active listings in the Villages of Purcellville and there were three homes with pending contracts.  None of those three have settled yet (two are short sales) and their average list price is $318,267.  Whew, that’s low.  The good news though is that three new listings have entered the market with an average list price of $404,000 (none are distressed sales).  It seems that the community had to work through its short sales and now the market is back to a normal level.

There has been no change in the number of closings in Village of Purcellville since August (seven year-to-date closings).  The year-to-date median sold price is $349,000, down 11 percent from the 2010 median.  Sellers in 2011 had more modest expectations than in 2010; original list prices more accurately matched market conditions as seen in a much lower average price decrease.  But, seller contributions increased 43 percent to an average of about $5,000.  The time it takes to sell a home did improve though from an average of 99 days in 2010 to just 50 days through August 31, 2011.

Please call me if now is the time for you to sell your home.  Prices are back!  Let’s take advantage of low supply and high demand.


Western Loudoun County Analysis: 2011 08

What Housing Downturn?  Not Here!

According to the Metropolitan Regional Information Service (MRIS), 379 homes were sold in the Western Loudoun area (consisting of Middleburg, Purcellville, Round Hill, Hamilton, Lovettsville and Waterford) from January 1 to August 31, 2011.  That represents an 11.5 percent increase over the total sales volume in the first eight months of 2010 and a 24 percent increase over the sales volume over the same period in 2009.  This is especially encouraging since the 2010 market was artificially stimulated by the First Time Buyers Credit.  2011 did not enjoy that boost and is still outperforming 2010.

By contrast, January through August home sales in the entire county totaled 3,234 units, 5 percent behind the 2010 total at the same time and 9 percent behind the 2009 total.

The table below lists August sales and median sales prices by area. In the second half of the year, sales volume typically declines so it is not unexpected to see a 19 percent monthly decline in Western Loudoun in August.  The good news though is that sales in August beat the August 2010 total by 12.5 percent.  Purcellville continues to dominate Western Loudoun with 37 percent of total sales volume.

After a rare and dramatic decrease in July, the median sales price in Western Loudoun rebounded 26 percent from $335,000 to $422,500.  The year-to-date median sales price is $410,000 (equal to the 2010 median).  Compare that to $365,000 in Eastern Loudoun and $395,000 in Leesburg.  So far this year, 40 percent of home sales in Western Loudoun were priced between $200,000 and $399,999, 32 percent were priced $400,000 to $599,999 and 3 percent were priced above $1,000,000.

Other pertinent statistics include:

  • The average days on market spiked again in August, this time it reached 138 days, primarily due to the fact that five of the 54 total sales were on the market an especially long time - four took over a year to sell and one finally sold after more than three years.  However, five units also sold in less than 30 days, three in 30 to 59 days and 4 in 60 to 89 days;
  • Compare the 138 day average in August in Western Loudoun to 45 days in Eastern Loudoun and 47 days in Leesburg;
  • So far this year, the average days on market in Western Loudoun is 134 days, 9 percent higher than the 2010 average;
  • The average close price to average original list price ratio measures sellers’ willingness to negotiate price.  In August, the ratio fell to 90.5 percent from 91.9 percent in July.  The comparable ratio in Eastern Loudoun was 96.9 percent and in Leesburg it was 95.7 percent;
  • In August, 50 of the 54 Western Loudoun sales were single family detached homes with an average close price of $459,420.  Interestingly, four townhomes sold last month – two in Middleburg – with an unusually high average sold price of $404,999;
  • Perhaps a plentiful supply is the secret to Western Loudoun’s success this year.  One would normally think that the market is oversupplied when inventory levels are at 7.3 months but sales here are outperforming Eastern Loudoun and Leesburg which have much lower inventory levels (2.4 and 3.5 months respectively); and
  • The year-to-date share of short sales and foreclosures (24.8 percent share of total sales) in 2011 rose slightly in August.  Middleburg and Waterford have had only one distressed sale each so far this year explaining their low shares while the percentage exceeds 23 percent in the other local areas.

Spotlight on Hamilton

Through the end of August 2011,

  • 43 homes have sold in Hamilton this year, 16 percent higher than over the same period in 2010 and a remarkable 48 percent higher than the 2009 total;
  • The August median sales price was $465,000, 58 percent higher than the July median;
  • On average, the days on market for the homes sold in August was 87;
  • The close price to list price ratio was 91.4 percent in August, slightly better than the Western Loudoun average;
  • So far this year, 24 percent of Hamilton sales have been distressed;
  • The average close price for the four detached homes sold in August was $491,725; and
  • The supply of available inventory amounted to 5.4 months.

Fortunately, Western Loudoun’s very low median sales price in July remedied itself in August and sales volume continues to amaze. Even though houses take much longer to sell than elsewhere in the county, who would’ve thought Western Loudoun would be boasting such a good 2011 record?

Rosemary deButts, Realtor, is associated with Atoka Properties located in historic Purcellville. She has the Short Sales and Foreclosure Resource certification and is a Member, Institute of Residential Marketing. Rosemary earned her degree in Economics from Randolph-Macon Woman’s College and her MBA from Old Dominion University.  For more information on the Western Loudoun housing market and guidance in buying or selling a home, contact Rosemary today (rosemary@atokaproperties.com; 540-454-6792; www.housinganalyst.net).                        


Loudoun County Housing Update: 2011 08

Steady but LOW Supply of Listings

The number of active listings in Loudoun County is a constantly fluctuating number as real estate agents add new listings, indicate they have contracts or are sold or they may expire or be withdrawn from the market at any time.  Therefore, the number of active listings reported for any given month is a “snapshot” of activity at roughly the same time every month.  The graph below illustrates the active listings (excluding rentals) for every month since January 2010.  You will immediately notice that the number ranged between 1,500 and 1,560 for the last five consecutive months.

The housing market is a highly cyclical industry but typically follows a bell curve.  Sales and listings are typically lowest in January and February with a steady increase from March to June (or July) followed by a steady monthly decline through the remainder of the year.  The fact that the number of listings in 2011 has been almost unchanged since April is remarkable and clearly out of the ordinary.

The monthly average of active listings in Loudoun this year is 1,423 per month.  That is 10 percent behind the monthly average in 2010, 21 percent behind the 2009 average and a whopping 52 percent behind the 2008 monthly average.  Fewer listings translates to fewer sales; 2011 sales in Loudoun are 5 percent behind 2010, 9 percent behind 2009 sales and 13 percent behind 2008 sales (through August of each year).

A shortage of listings creates supply constraints.  The graph below shows the month’s supply of inventory (active listings divided by monthly sales) in 2010 compared to 2011.  With the exception January and March, the month’s supply of inventory in 2011 was less than the comparable month in 2010.  And while the inventory increased in the third quarter of 2010, it’s declining so far in 2011.  A market is typically considered to be in equilibrium in this market (there is enough supply to satisfy demand) when the month’s supply of inventory is four to five months.  With a 2011 monthly average of only 3.6 months, the market continues to be undersupplied.

But that’s not the whole story.  The market is significantly undersupplied in Eastern Loudoun, slightly undersupplied in Leesburg but oversupplied in Western Loudoun.  The 2011 average month’s supply of inventory in Eastern Loudoun is 2.7 months, the average in Leesburg is 3.9 months and the average in Western Loudoun is 8 months.

Other preliminary August results include:

  • Uncharacteristically, sales volume increased in August, albeit by only four units.  At 465 units, sales improved .9 percent compared to July and 7 percent compared to last August;
  • So far in 2011, 65 percent of Loudoun’s sales were located in Eastern Loudoun, 25 percent were in Leesburg, and 12 percent were in Western Loudoun.
  • The preliminary August median sales price was $387,210, +2 percent vs. the August 2010 median.  The year-to-date median is $380,000, 6 percent higher than the 2010 median;
  • The average seller contribution jumped 32 percent from July to $5,084 making the 2011 average $3,859;
  • The average days on market was 56 days resulting in a new 2011 average of 51 days.  Compare that to the 2010 average of 43 days.  There is a wide discrepancy by area – the August average in Eastern Loudoun was 45 days and it was 47 days in Leesburg but Western Loudoun’s monthly average days on market reached 138 days in August;
  • In 2011, 55 percent of sales were detached homes, 39 percent were attached homes and 6 percent were condominiums;
  • The average close price for detached homes was $529,224 in August;
  • The average close price for attached homes was $328,460;
  • The average close price for condominiums was $200,268;
  • Pending sales continued to decline.  The number of new pending listings fell from 473 in June to 377 in July (-96 units) and again to 340 (-37 units) in August;
  • For the fifth consecutive month, the average close price to original list price ratio exceeded 95 percent; and
  • The share of distressed sales advanced from 20 percent in July to 22 percent in August.  Last August the share was 28 percent.

For more detail on the Loudoun County housing market, please see:  Loudoun County Housing Analysis 2011 08


Metro DC Housing Market Analysis: 2011 08

Sales Slump; Median Sales Prices Hang On

September 8, 2011

(Washington, DC) – So far this year, sales volume in the metropolitan Washington, DC existing home market is outperforming 2008, when the home sales bottomed out in this region, but cannot seem to build a head of steam.  The region consists of Loudoun, Montgomery and Prince George’s counties; the cities of Manassas, Manassas Park, and Prince William County (PWAR); Arlington and Fairfax counties, the cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church (NVAR); and the District of Columbia.  The table below lists the January through August sales volume for each area for every year since 2006.  Sales in the entire region are about 9 percent behind 2010 (recall though that the market was artificially stimulated during the first half of 2010 by the First Time Buyers Credit) but roughly 3 percent higher than at the end of August 2008.

Since 2006, sales volume in Loudoun County and NVAR have consistently declined, falling in 2011 by 21 percent  and 22 percent respectively behind the January through August volume in 2006.  The highest monthly volume is typically found in NVAR and Montgomery County;  these two areas account for 51 percent of the region’s total sales volume in 2011.  Both have seen volume declines in the last two years, strongly affecting the region totals.

  

The District and Virginia suburbs seem to be faring better than the Maryland suburbs.  Montgomery County’s January through August sales volume is off by 31 percent compared to 2006 and in Prince George’s County, sales volume has declined 37 percent.  The District has the best record with a decline compared to 2006 of only 17 percent.  The Virginia suburbs’ declines range from 21 percent in Loudoun County compared to sales in 2006 and 27 percent in PWAR.

With the exception of Prince George’s County, the 2011 January through August median sales price beats both the 2009 and 2010 medians at the same time of year everywhere else in the region.  The regional median of $330,000 is $85,000 less than it was at the end of August in 2006 but $20,000 higher than it was two years ago.  The largest percentage increase since last year has been in Loudoun where the year-to-date median is now $380,000.  NVAR leads the region with a median of $418,000 followed in second place by the District with a 2011 median of $399,900.

 

 It takes longer to sell existing homes this year compared to last throughout the region.  Last year the average days on market was 62 days in metro DC; this year the average is 71 days.  The largest leap was in PWAR where an extra two weeks was added to the expected time to sell this year.  It is interesting that even with the big jump, PWAR still has the lowest average in the region.  Prince George’s County’s average exceeded 100 days four of the last eight months resulting in the highest average in the region.

 

The year-to-date average close price to original list price ratio in the metro DC area was 94.3 percent (as of August 31st).  Every month this year, the ratio was slightly below the 2010 ratio so the year-to-date average from 2010 is not much different, 94.5 percent.  The highest year-to-date average is in PWAR (96 percent) and the lowest is in Prince George’s County (89.4 percent).

The share of distressed sales so far this year has declined in every area except in Prince George’s County where 63 percent of 2011 sales were either short sales or bank owned properties.  The lowest share is found in the District (14 percent) and it is below 30 percent in Loudoun, Montgomery and NVAR.

Given the disappointing sales in metro DC this year, it is encouraging to see that the monthly sales volume actually increased in August compared to July (albeit by only four units).  With the exception of Loudoun, the component areas followed the usual trend – steady monthly sales volume declines through February of the following year.  Since sales volume was alarmingly low in the second half of 2010 (following the expiration of the First Time Buyers Credit June 30th), it would be nice to see month-over-year increases through the end of 2011.  The District and the northern Virginia suburbs did their part but August sales in Montgomery and Prince George’s fell behind August 2010 totals (-5 and -12 percent respectively).

For more detail, please see Metro DC EH Analysis 2011 08.


Washington, DC Home Price Index 2011 06

Washington’s Housing Market Still #1

Case-Shiller revises their monthly Home Price Index for the previous 24-month period as new information becomes available.  Although the month-over-year change in Washington, DC’s HPI was revised down for the last three months, the streak remains unbroken.  According to the June edition of the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index, Washington, DC again posted the best month-over-year level among the largest housing markets in the country AND chalked up the 25th consecutive month that the HPI in the DC market led the country (183.61).  That represents a 4.08 point advance over May (+2.3 percent).

The Index in Chicago did advance on a month-over-month basis at a faster rate, 3.6 percent.  But the Index there is a considerably lower 115.61.  For the sake of comparison, Detroit’s Index measured 65.42 in June, again posting the lowest HPI in the country.

The S&P/Case-Shiller® Home Price Index measures the residential housing market, tracking changes in the value of the residential real estate market.  This Index uses a repeat sales pricing technique that collects data on single-family home resales, capturing resold prices to form sale pairs using a moving three month average. Call Rosemary for an analysis of the marketability of your home.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.