Metro DC Average Days on Market: 2011 07
Posted: August 23, 2011 Filed under: Average Days on Market | Tags: 2011, Alexandria, Arlington County, days on market, dc, Fairfax, Loudoun, Market Trends, Montgomery County, NVAR, Prince George's County, Prince William County, Washington Leave a comment »It Takes Longer to Sell Homes in 2011 Throughout the Metro DC Region
The graph below compares the 2010 average days on market for the metro DC region and its component jurisdictions to the year-to-date average through July in 2011.
In every case, the 2011 average days on market has increased compared to last year:
- Metro DC + 16.9%
- Loudoun + 25.3%
- Montgomery + 17.4%
- NVAR + 17.1%
- Prince George’s + 8.1%
- PWAR + 34.0%
- District of Columbia + 10.4%
PWAR (Prince William County and the cities of Manassas and Manassas Park) has the lowest 2011 average in the region at only 54 days. However, it has also seen the largest increase from 2010 (40 days, +34 percent). Prince George’s County had the smallest jump compared to last year and it’s the only area with less than a 10 percent increase. However, its 2011 year-to-date average days on market far outpaces the average in other areas in metro DC (81 percent higher than PWAR).
Metro DC Median Sales Prices 2011 07
Posted: August 19, 2011 Filed under: Median Sales Prices, Metro DC Housing Analysis | Tags: 2011, dc, Fairfax, Loudoun, Market Trends, Median Sales Price, Montgomery County, NVAR, Price Changes, Prince William County, Washington Leave a comment »Median Sales Prices Reach New Highs
The table below lists the median sales price in July 2011 compared to June 2011 and July 2010. The median sales price in the District of Columbia reached a significant milestone in July. Before July, the median had not reached $445,000 since June 2006 when the market was at the height of the housing boom here in metro DC. Similarly, NVAR (Arlington and Fairfax counties and the cities of Alexandria, Fairfax, and Falls Church) posted its highest median sales price since August of 2007. Montgomery County’s median was at its highest level since August of 2010. The metro DC July median ($355,000), including all the counties and jurisdictions illustrated below, matched the July 2010 median and increased the number of consecutive months the 2011 median met or exceeded the median in the corresponding month in 2010 to three.
Metro DC Existing Home Sales 2006-2011 (Jan-Jul)
Posted: August 19, 2011 Filed under: Metro DC Housing Analysis | Tags: 2011, dc, Loudoun, Market Trends, Montgomery County, NVAR, Prince George's County, Prince William County, Washington Leave a comment »Metro DC Homes Sales in 2011 Exceed 2008 Totals
The table below lists the existing home sales for the close-in counties and the District for the period January through July for every year since 2006. Total year-to-date sales in Loudoun County, NVAR (Fairfax and Arlington counties, Fairfax, Falls Church and Alexandria cities), and PWAR (Prince William County, Manassas and Manassas Park cities) have failed to reach the levels from any of the last five years. Prince George’s and Montogomery counties and the District have not met 2010 sales levels but are exceeding those from 2009 and 2008. The region as a whole though is 10 percent below 2010 levels, 6 percent behind 2009 but 5 percent ahead of 2008 sales totals through July.
Loudoun County Housing Update: 2011 07
Posted: August 10, 2011 Filed under: Loudoun County Housing Update | Tags: 2011, Average Close Price, days on market, eastern loudoun, Foreclosures, leesburg, Loudoun, Market Trends, Median Sales Price, Pending Listings, Price Changes, Pricing, Sales, Seller Subsidies, Short Sales, western loudoun Leave a comment »Share of Distressed Sales Plummets
MRIS, the multiple listing service handling Loudoun County existing home sales and records, began requiring agents to designate distressed sales (short sales and bank-owned properties) in the first quarter of 2009 at the height of the foreclosure crisis in this area. At the time, 47 percent of Loudoun’s total home sales were distressed. Since then, the share of distressed sales has trended down and as of July 31, 2011, the share was only 20 percent here in Loudoun County. The graph below summarizes the monthly share of distressed sales since May 2009 and the red line indicates the overall trend.
Compare the July result in Loudoun to other areas in the metropolitan DC region:
Metro DC Share of Distressed Sales (July 2011)
- Loudoun = 20 percent
- Fairfax County and city, Arlington, Alexandria, Falls Church = 13 percent
- Prince William, Manassas, Manassas Park = 35 percent
- Prince George’s County, MD = 57 percent
- Montgomery County, MD = 18 percent
- District of Columbia = 9 percent
Existing home sales activity typically begins to decline in Loudoun County in July. 2011 was no exception but it did not post as sharp a decline from June to July this year as it did last year. Recall that the First Time Buyers Credit expired on June 30, 2010. Sales in the third quarter of 2010 suffered mightily last year. From June to July 2010, sales declined 30 percent from 577 units to 404. This year the decline amounted to 21 percent, from 574 units to 452. While that is good news, sales volume in July 2011 was the second lowest since 2006. The county is on pace to end the year with 5 percent fewer sales than last year and has the lowest year-to-date volume in six years (at least). There was a rare phenomenon in July…sales volume increased significantly in Western Loudoun (+12 percent) to reach a six year high. Both Eastern Loudoun and Leesburg had the more typical declines (-23 and -3 percent respectively).
Prices though are a bright spot. Over the last four consecutive months, the monthly median sales price in Loudoun has outpaced the median from the corresponding month in 2010. It suffered a slight decline in July, from $400,000 in June to $389,000, but was 2 percent higher than the July 2010 median ($382,000). It was wonderful that Western Loudoun volume increased but the problem was that the median sales price there dropped a full $100,000. Since sales in Western Loudoun only accounted for 15 percent of the county’s total, its 23 percent median sales price decline resulted in an overall county median sales price decrease of only 3 percent.
Other July results include:
- The average seller contribution was $3,656, about equal to the 2011 average of 3,681;
- Average days on market was 52 days falling below the corresponding month in 2010 for the first time this year and the 2011 average is 24 percent higher than the 2010 average;
- In 2011, 55 percent of sales were detached homes, 40 percent were attached homes and 5 percent were condominiums;
- The average close price for detached homes was $523,882 in July;
- The average close price for attached homes was $308,613;
- The average close price for condominiums was $175,760;
- The 2011 average attached home and condominium monthly sales were down 10 percent and 33 percent respectively from the 2010 monthly average;
- Even though detached and attached prices were slightly higher in July than the 2010 average, the average condominium price was 5 percent lower than the 2010 average;
- The number of active listings has stabilized in the 1,500 range over the last four months;
- Pending sales declined 20 percent from June (377 vs. 473 in June and 488 last July);
- For the fourth consecutive month, the average close price to original list price ratio exceeded 95 percent; and
- The month’s supply of inventory amounted to 3.4 months for the entire county and was only 2.7 months in Eastern Loudoun (posting the fourth consecutive month less than 3 months).
For more detail on the Loudoun County housing market, please see: Loudoun County Housing Analysis 2011 07
Metro DC Housing Market Analysis: 2011 07
Posted: August 9, 2011 Filed under: Metro DC Housing Analysis | Tags: 2011, Alexandria, Arlington County, Average Close Price, days on market, Fairfax, Foreclosures, Housing, Loudoun, Market Trends, Median Sales Price, Montgomery County, NVAR, Prince George's County, Prince William County, Recovery, Sales, Short Sales, Washington Leave a comment »Prince George’s County Continues to Struggle
August 9, 2011
(Washington, DC) – Prince George’s County is one of the components of the Metropolitan Washington, DC region (which also includes Montgomery County in Maryland, Arlington, Fairfax, Loudoun, and Prince William counties in Virginia and the cities of Alexandria, Falls Church, Fairfax, Manassas and Manassas Park in Virginia and Washington, DC). Since 2006, Prince George’s has generated 14 percent of the region’s total existing home sales volume. Even though it has always been known as an affordable alternative to the more costly DC suburbs, Prince George’s County is an anomaly in this region; its housing market is in a steep and steady decline.
Consider the fact that the entire metro DC region has suffered a 21 percent decline in its year-to-date median sales price (January through July each year) since 2006. Bad enough, to be sure, but the comparable decline in Prince George’s County is a whopping 50 percent and still falling. While the year-to-date median sales price has seen modest increases throughout the metro area in 2010 and 2011, Prince George’s County has had six consecutive years of median price decreases.
-
Metro DC Jan-Jul 2006 MSP = $415,000; Metro DC Jan-Jul 2011 MSP = $330,000
-
PGC Jan-Jul 2006 MSP = $320,000; PGC Jan-Jul 2011 MSP = $160,000
So far this year, the median sales price in Prince George’s County has declined 7 percent whereas the median has increased 18 percent for the entire region and while the metro area had three decreases in the last seven months, Prince George’s has had five.
-
Metro DC Jan 2011 MSP = $299,900; Jul 2011 = $355,000
-
PGC Jan 2011 MSP = $171,900; Jul 2011 = $160,000
Compare the July average days on market in the metro DC area of 64 days to the comparable average in Prince George’s County – 104 days. The average across the region declined 19 percent from January to July 2011 while it increased 17 percent in Prince George’s County.
-
Metro DC Avg Days on Market Jan 2011 = 79 days; Jul 2011 = 64 days
-
PGC Avg Days on Market Jan 2011 = 89 days; July 2011 = 104 days
-
Metro DC YTD Avg Days on Market 2011 = 72 days
-
PGC YTD Avg Days on Market 2011 = 98 days
The year-to-date average close price to original list price ratio in the metro DC area was 94.2 percent (as of July 31st) with five consecutive months above 94 percent. In Prince George’s County, the year-to-date average is 89.3 percent and it’s had five consecutive months below 90 percent.
Another troubling aspect of the Prince George’s County market is its share of distressed sales (short sales and bank-owned properties). The ratio is trending down but it is still strikingly high. Roughly 23 percent of metro DC’s sales in July 2011 were distressed. About 57 percent of Prince George’s sales were distressed in July. Through the end of July, the 2011 average share of distressed sales in the metro area was 32 percent; it was 64 percent in Prince George’s County. Further, for the last two consecutive months the metro DC share was less than 25 percent; it was above 55 percent in Prince George’s County since May 2010.
By contrast, the other component jurisdictions and realtor associations in the metro DC area have all seen year-to-date median sales price increases in 2011 compared to 2010; the 2011 average days on market is below 80 days elsewhere in the region; the 2011 average close price to original list price ratio exceeds 93 percent everywhere but Prince George’s County; and the 2011 average share of distressed sales exclusive of Prince George’s ranges from 15 percent in the District of Columbia to 43 percent in the Prince William realtor association (PWAR).
For more detail, please see Metro Dc Housing Analysis 2011 07
Western Loudoun County Analysis: 2011 07
Posted: August 8, 2011 Filed under: Western Loudoun County Analysis | Tags: 2011, Average Close Price, days on market, Inventory, Loudoun, Market Trends, Median Sales Price, Price Changes, Pricing, Sales, western loudoun Leave a comment »Record Breaking Home Sales in July
According to the Metropolitan Regional Information Service (MRIS), the 67 home sales during July in the Western Loudoun area (consisting of Middleburg, Purcellville, Round Hill, Hamilton, Lovettsville and Waterford) increased 12 percent from June and reached its highest monthly level in at least four years. In fact, 2011 sales through July have outpaced total sales from January to July 2010 by 11 percent and beat the 2009 total through July by 23 percent. In a typical year, the highest monthly sales in Western Loudoun are posted in June or July so we can expect monthly sales to decline through the rest of the year.
By contrast, home sales declined from 574 units in June to 452 in July for the entire county (-23 percent).
The table below lists July sales by area. Purcellville regained its dominance by posting 39 percent of the total sales last month in Western Loudoun in addition to a 53 percent increase over June and an 86 percent increase over last July. Middleburg’s five sales in July represented a 400 percent increase over the one sale it had last July.
Although Western Loudoun posted stellar home sales in July, the median sales price took a huge hit. The median in both May and June was $435,000 in Western Loudoun. In July, it dropped 23 percent and $100,000 to $335,000. A whopping 51 percent of the increased number of sales in July were priced between $200,000 and $399,999 and only one home sold at a price higher than $1,000,000. Compare that to June when only 33 percent of sales were priced in the $200,000 to $399,999 range and 3 homes sold for more than $1,000,000. The good news though is that the year-to-date median sales price only decreased $5,000 from June to $410,000 which is equal to the 2010 median. The median sales price more than doubled last month in Middleburg, the only Western Loudoun area to see a month-over-month increase. Although not shown above and interestingly, the year-to-date median sales price in Waterford is $749,000 while it is only $550,000 in Middleburg.
Typically, homes in Western Loudoun are on the market longer than those in other areas of the county. For example, the average days on market in Western Loudoun during July 2011 amounted to 87 days, down from a revised 114 days in June and 60 days last July. By contrast, homes sold in only 41 days on average in Eastern Loudoun during July while the average was just 61 days in Leesburg. Since January 2010, the lowest average in Western Loudoun occurred last July (60 days) and the highest was in January 2010 (235 days).
Thirty homes (45 percent) sold in 30 days or less last month with an average close price of $350,480. Compare that to 52 percent across the entire county with an average close price of $401,527. There were three closings in Western Loudoun during July that took longer than a year to sell; the average close price of these units was $786,000. They combined with three others in Eastern Loudoun and Leesburg to bring the county total to six units during July that were on the market over a year; the average close price of all six was $713,750.
Like sales totals, the days on market indicator varies significantly by individual market. Lovettsville had the lowest July average with 43 days while the average in Middleburg was 208 days (one of the five was on the market 508 days).
The average close price to original list price ratio may reflect two things: sellers’ ability to accurately price their homes to match market conditions and/or their willingness to negotiate price. The ratio decreased in July to 91.9 percent from a revised 94.9 percent in June. Western Loudoun normally has the lowest close price to original list price ratio; it was 96.5 percent in Eastern Loudoun and 94.8 percent in Leesburg last month. Here in the west, the lowest ratio occurred in Hamilton (86.0 percent) and the highest was found in Waterford (94.2 percent).
In June, eight townhouses sold in Western Loudoun at an average price of $209,113. The average price for the 59 detached homes sold last month was $426,211. Condominiums are not a factor in Western Loudoun.
The year-to-date share of short sales and foreclosures (24.6 percent distressed sales) in 2011 is the result of five consecutive months of declines from February to June. Compare that 24.6 percent to this time last year when the year-to-date share of distressed sales was 34.9 percent. Middleburg and Waterford have had only one distressed sale each so far this year explaining their low shares while the percentage exceeds 23 percent in the other local areas.
Even though the month’s supply of inventory reached its lowest point this year in July at 5.8 months, it is considerably higher in Western Loudoun than elsewhere in the county. Note that the months of supply in Eastern Loudoun was 2.7 months during July and it was 4.0 months in Leesburg. West of Leesburg, Waterford had the highest available inventory at 18.5 months and Round Hill had the lowest at 4.1 months of supply in July.
Spotlight on Round Hill
Through the end of July, 69 homes sold in Round Hill this year representing 21 percent of the Western Loudoun total. That’s an average of about 10 homes per month which matches the 2010 pace. The year-to-date median sales price was $370,000 at the end of July, -1 percent from the 2010 median of $373,000. About 51 percent of Round Hill’s 2011 sales were priced between $200,000 and $399,999, another 25 percent were in the $400,000 to $599,999 range. The average days on market in Round Hill was 115 days in June; it declined to 86 days in July. The close price to original list price ratio was 93.9 percent in July, a far cry from 64.3 percent in February. So far this year, 30 percent of Round Hill sales were distressed (one of the highest ratios in Western Loudoun) but the month’s supply of inventory, at only 4.1 months, is the lowest in the west and suggests it may be on the verge of being undersupplied.
Western Loudoun had a shocking number of sales in July, posting the highest monthly sales figure in years, something the county as a whole cannot claim. However, the dramatic decline in the median sales price is troubling and hopefully a one-month anomoly.
Rosemary deButts, Realtor, is associated with Atoka Properties located in historic Purcellville. She has the Short Sales and Foreclosure Resource certification and is a Member, Institute of Residential Marketing. Rosemary earned her degree in Economics from Randolph-Macon Woman’s College and her MBA from Old Dominion University. For more information on the Western Loudoun housing market and guidance in buying or selling a home, contact Rosemary today (rosemary@atokaproperties.com; 540-454-6792; www.housinganalyst.net).
Old Dominion Valley Subdivision Analysis
Posted: August 2, 2011 Filed under: Subdivision Analysis | Tags: 2011, Average Close Price, days on market, Loudoun, Market Trends, Median Sales Price, Old Dominion Valley, Pending Listings, Price Changes, Seller Subsidies, Short Sales, Villages of Purcellville, western loudoun Leave a comment »Significant Improvement in 2011
In all of 2010, only two homes sold in Purcellville’s Old Dominion Valley neighborhood. So far in 2011, four homes have changed hands. Even more important though is that the year-to-date median sales price in Old Dominion Valley is $428,000, $48,000 and 13 percent higher than the 2010 median of $380,000. Last year, list prices were reduced an average of 3.5 percent ($14,500) before receiving a contract; this year the average price decrease is only $2,275 or .5 percent (an 84 percent drop from last year). Average seller contributions have declined 16 percent this year to $6,750. The average time to sell dropped from 113 days in 2010 to 39 days in 2011. One of the two sales last year was a bank-owned property and the other was a standard (non-distressed) sale.
There were only two active listings in Old Dominion Valley as of August 2nd. The current average list price is very low, only $390,300. That’s because one of the active listings is a bank-owned property offered at $370,700. The remaining standard active listing has an asking price of $409,900. They have been on the market an average of 93 days.
The one pending sale is a short sale that had a contract in just fourteen days at a list price of $419,900.
If now is the time for you to move, I would be honored to help you sell your home and/or answer any questions you may have about the real estate market here in Loudoun County.
Look for my new column in The Purcellville Gazette: “The Dirt on the Market”
Month’s Supply of Inventory by Price Range 2011 06
Posted: July 28, 2011 Filed under: Month's Supply of Inventory | Tags: 2011, eastern loudoun, Inventory, leesburg, Loudoun, Market Trends, western loudoun Leave a comment »Not Enough Inventory for Homes Priced below $800,000
The cluster of columns on the far right of the graph below illustrates the month’s supply of inventory in Loudoun County for all price ranges. A market is generally considered to be in equilibrium (there is enough supply to satisfy demand) when the MSI equals four to five months. As you can see, Loudoun County is undersupplied in the eastern portion of the county and in Leesburg. However, there is enough supply in western Loudoun by virtue of its 6.4 month’s of supply.
If we break this down by price range, we can see that all three areas are undersupplied at list prices below $200,000. Further, eastern Loudoun and Leesburg are undersupplied at all prices below $800,000. Western Loudoun has a healthy supply of inventory for homes priced $200,000 to $599,999 but becomes oversupplied with homes priced over $600,000 and it is severely oversupplied with homes priced in excess of $1,000,000 (only four homes priced $1,000,000 or more have sold in all of Loudoun County this year, all in Waterford).
As of July 7th, there were 20 active listings in eastern Loudoun, 69 in Leesburg and 77 in western Loudoun priced over $1,000,000. Compare that to the 50 listings for homes priced below $200,000 (21 in eastern Loudoun, 23 in Leesburg and 6 in western Loudoun) at the same time.
This analysis confirms that Loudoun County continues to suffer from a shortage of supply that is severely constraining existing home sales.
The month’s supply of inventory is calculated by dividing the active listings in a particular area (snapshot of activity) by the sales in that area over the previous month. The definition of active listings excludes rentals and pending sales (those with contingencies or contracts) in this analysis. Close prices are used for the sales and current list prices are used for the active listings to group them by price range.

















































